An Example of the Stamping Dilemma

Author:
Mike Grossman
,  
Professional Engineer
|
Editor:
No items found.
🕜
3
Minute Read
|
🗓️
Updated:
January 2, 2019
An Example of the Stamping Dilemma

The PPE Headquarters promise

We strive to help you make smarter exam preparation decisions. We adhere to an editorial integrity, so this article does not contain references to affiliate products or services.

Early in my career, I worked as a project engineer for a company that designed, fabricated, and assembled compressor packages in Calgary, Alberta. We did this for domestic and even sometimes international customers.

We designed and fabricated pressure vessels, pressure piping, structural skids and mounted rotational equipment. We assembled these components and shipped them to customers.

The design work was communicated by issuing drawings for the vessels, piping and skids and also included process and instrumentation diagrams, and what we called service flow diagrams as well. Occasionally we were asked to stamp or authenticate the design and we always argued which diagrams we should be stamping.

Most of the professionals in the office were reluctant to stamp diagrams. There was a thought that we were under significant risk if there was any sort of mistakes. Therefore there was a strong argument to simply stamp the P&ID diagram only. A confirming argument would be made along the lines of the P&ID being the only thing that is technically "designed".

However, we know from our Associations that any sort of drawing that is issued for construction needs to be authenticated. Thus the question becomes what if that drawing is not for the customer and is simply internal.  

To stamp internal and external diagrams

Picture

To clear things up the Act that APEGA upholds (Engineering and Geoscience Professions General Regulation, reference sections 49 and 54 {Thank you to John Sinclair}), does not distinguish between drawings used internally or externally.

So, all final documents, not only drawings, that are issued and prepared by a professional, must be stamped by a qualified engineer. Final refers to a professional document issued to another on which that person is permitted to rely on that design. So the design documents that we issued to the shop all required a stamp.

Although this is the Act and it is clearly stated, few professionals follow this part of the Act.

Update: APEGA now requires all final documents to be stamped, whereas some associations only require external documents to have a stamp.  

To stamp or not to stamp

Picture


It's important to note that the stamp is not a warranty or a guarantee of accuracy. The stamp communicates that a licensed professional has accepted responsibility for the document. You are not expected to be perfect and mistake free. Yet, you are expected to utilize sound, professional judgement, in an area that you have expertise.  

​If you do not adhere to the professional standards that your Association requires, you may be punished regardless of whether you stamped a document or not.  

I hope that clears things up regarding the stamp, as I know a lot of confusion exists in industry.

NPPE Exam: 2024 Study Guide + FREE Practice Exam
11
MIN READ

NPPE Exam: 2024 Study Guide + FREE Practice Exam

NPPE exam ready in 5 hours: Study Guide (1 hrs) + Practice Exams (3-4 hrs) + Strategy Modules (0.5 hrs). Don't buy the textbooks.

P. Eng. Designation in 5 Easy Steps
10
MIN READ

P. Eng. Designation in 5 Easy Steps

P. Eng. is a term protected in Canada by regulatory associations ensuring only qualified individuals practice engineering.

NPPE Exam Dates
6
MIN READ

NPPE Exam Dates

Exam Dates & Deadlines to Register for the 2024 NPPE Exam. You can be NPPE Exam Ready in 5-8 hours, over 1-2 days.